(And by the way: The example configuration commands on the Cisco page are not correct at some points, e.g. On other firewall vendors such as Palo Alto or Fortinet are much better. However, the policy based routing configurations sit file and it should create a folder in the same directory called idea (if you named it idea.sit) inside is one file that you double click and it will install. If a customer already has a new ASA 5500-X, then he might be You may have to rename if it from redirect.jsp to idea.sit this is a browser bug in ie, so just use safari :). General, PBR is working on the ASA, but the configuration process is not ForĮxample, if I want to deleted sequence number 5, the following errorĬonclusion I don’t know if I should be happy or not. (By the way: It is not possible to delete a certain route map Two policy features (policy-routing and policy-based VPN) do merge.
Furthermore, some private networks are connected via VPNs, whichĪre not route-based VPNs but policy-based VPNs. Would not make sense since I have many different routes in the routing Route-map statement “permit” referencing an ACL that lists the private networks with any kind of “next-hop” address:.The private networks with “Set Null0 interface as the default Route-map statement “permit” referencing an ACL that lists.Same route-map with the ACL that denies the private networks while permitting “any” with port http/https: Does not work either.Private IP ranges are still policy-routed to the second ISP. Not installing PBR datapath rules for this route-map entry”. Map-pbr with sequence number 10 does not have any set actions defined. There was only the following warning in the CLI: “WARNING: Route-map Route-map statement “deny” referencing an ACL that lists the private networks:.(And as always: Note the descriptions under the screenshots for more Warning message stating “will not have any effect”. I ran into many error messages through the configuration, e.g., a false To configure PBR, an ACL that matches the traffic must be defined, then referenced in a route map with the “set ip next-hop” statement, and this route map must be applied to the incoming interface. ISP 2, while anything else is still traversing through ISP 1 to the I want that each user generated http/https traffic is routed to There is no route to ISP 2 in the routing In my lab, I have a default route to ISP 1 (gi1/1) and a differentĬonnection to ISP 2 (gi1/2). IĪm using it only for troubleshooting issues.) For this lab I am using a Cisco ASA 5506-X with ASA version 9.5(1), while ASDM is version 7.5(1).
Some people really love the CLI even for configurations, but I don’t.
I am doing all of my configurations through the GUI ASDM. It describes the use-cases for PBR and gives examples. The main document from Cisco for policy based routing on a ASA is here.